Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg

Peter may not have been “Pope” as we understand it now, but in the AD 60s, both he and Paul were executed after serving at the Church in the belly of the beast, which in AD 64-67 was Nero’s Rome. Since Peter was heading the Church in Rome when he was killed, the Bishop of Rome is now considered his successor. That St. Peter was there, in Rome, was attested to by Clement of Rome, the 3rd Bishop of Rome or “Pope” if you will, in his letter which circulated in the AD 90s.


191 posted on 07/02/2008 2:17:54 PM PDT by ChurtleDawg (voting only encourages them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: ChurtleDawg
Peter may not have been “Pope” as we understand it now...

Precisely. The acorn and oak tree look nothing alike.

207 posted on 07/02/2008 2:54:15 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson