That is your own man-made interpretation of Scripture. You take verses from a Holy book whose every word was discerned BY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH to be the inspired Word of God to deny Catholic theology. Ironic and funny.
If you would be Biblical, then you then must prove (in like manner as we can substantiate other major doctrines) from the Scriptures a perpetuated Petrine papacy, paedo baptism, purgatory, the perpetual virginity of Mary, praying to departed saints, etc.
And as said before, your logic that the entity that “gave us the Bible” (after 1500 years) is also it’s sole infallible interpreter would also mean that the church should have submitted to the interpretations of the scribes and the Pharisees, as the Jews gave us the O.T. (referred to as the “Scriptures”). But they were shown from the Scriptures that they were wrong, and likewise many RC doctrines fail Scriptural warrant or contradict them. The idea that Rome can be unreprovable is based upon her interpretation and is perverse, while implicit trust in her is historically shown to be dangerous, and is damnable to souls deceived by her. For whom we pray.