“And that while there was an oral tradition, if it was wholly inspired then this would have been written down as was the Biblical manner”
Profoundly devastating to your own case. Christ lives. Christ spoke and interacted enough to fill volumes, yet it is not written down. You’re claiming Christ’s Life is only contained in the Bible. Your Christ is a dead Christ, mine lives. Through His Life, Tradition, the Bible, and His Church that he founded for us.
Protestantism has tradition right at its core. The canon of Scripture is itself a tradition nowhere established in the Bible. It’s a church tradition. Protestants are in the position of having its primary authority not being able to justify its own existence.
All Christ did was indeed inspired of God, but what i am referring to was records of what He said and did, which if written wholly inspired, would be part of the revelation that the Holy Spirit states is wholly inspired. To hold that a written or oral tradition is equal to that is to essentially hold that that the canon is not closed. And to allow the teaching as God-inspired doctrines that are the unwarranted commandments of men.
“The canon of Scripture is itself a tradition..”
Indeed it is, though the inspired books are established as Scripture not due to ecclesiastical decree, but to their manifest enduring purity and power down thru history. And as i also stated, sola scriptura does not disallow history, or God “speaking” to us today, but such must be subject to the established (2 Tim. 3:16) word of God, the Scriptures, which what the Lord and His apostles often proved things by (in addition to powerful Divine attestation), and were themselves proved to be sound by.