You have objected to the use of the term sola ecclesia without demonstrating that it is not accurate...
I am sorry you could not understand the demonstration.
...and the use of the term copyright contention, without negating the it’s essential application...
Again, sorry you didn't get it.
...and instead charge me with lying and demand one must be a lawyer to make a statement about copyright law.
I made no such demand. I pointed out that one who gets it SO WRONG probably is not a lawyer.
“I think I touched a nerve. LOL.”
It seem evident that is what you do best.
“I made no such demand. I pointed out that one who gets it SO WRONG probably is not a lawyer.”
Then perhaps you should actually prove that my use of the term “copyright” contention” was not accurately descriptive (but “so wrong) of one who contends that Rome wrote the Bible. I am listening. Then justify why the use of sola ecclesia is so laughable.