Replies

"No, but I can put all the base elements for DNA in a bag and shake it around and get DNA. Would it match your DNA? No, it certainly wouldn't, but that isn't the point is it?" [excerpt]

By that same token, you should be able to put all the ingredients of an animal in a blender and get a living creature.

When I say DNA, I'm NOT talking about a chemical soup.

"It appears to me that ID agrees 100% with the theory of evolution except that the ID'ers believe God started the evolutionary process. And since the TOE doesn't say anything about how life was created I fail to see the conflict." [excerpt]

It may certainly appear that way to you, but that doesn't mean your correct.

I believe in ID, and the idea behind ID is contradictory to Evolution.

I also don't believe that God started the 'Evolutionary Process'
(I belive that God designed all genetic information, which has, since the fall, Devolved.)

I'm pretty sure Berkley would disagree with you about TOE. ;)

BTW, TOE claims a net increase of usable information, TOC claims a net DECREASE of usable information.

Thats a pretty clear contradiction.

I believe in ID, and the idea behind ID is contradictory to Evolution.

Where is the contradiction?

I also don't believe that God started the 'Evolutionary Process' (I belive that God designed all genetic information, which has, since the fall, Devolved.)

So you believe God screwed up and you believe in devolution? Do you also believe that mankind was created separately from everything else?

BTW, TOE claims a net increase of usable information, TOC claims a net DECREASE of usable information.

Yes I understand that the 'Theory of Creation' disagrees with evolution but the theory of Intelligent Design claims a net increase in usable information too.

So what are you a proponent of Creation or ID?