I don’t mind.
xzins’ post can be restored. I have no qualms with it. I’ve said my piece on the accusations.
The RM can restore or not restore the post. I think it was pretty general, actually.
I said that your catholic pings dating back to 2005, a posting history that only goes back to 2005, a lack of protestant posts or pings, a relatively young age in 2005, and a recent claim of a conversion makes it possible to question the credibility of the claims.
Now, we all know that God knows, but if this is some effort to give the RC’s a coup in their discussions with the Prot’s, then the credibility question negates its effectiveness.
I think I also allowed that any prot posts on the part of US7 would certainly mitigate.