"Leaving out some details while emphasizing others at different times does not make him a liar."
Brother Millet must have written that!
f we reject Joseph Smith for offering various accounts that emphasize or exclude different details of the same experience, then by that standard we would also have to reject the Bible. For example, Luke 24:4 says that two angels appeared at the empty tomb to several women, while Matthew 28:2 mentions just one angel. Anti-Mormon writers would have riotous fun with this "contradiction" if it occurred in the Book of Mormon. However, we can give the Bible the benefit of a doubt by suggesting that both Matthew and Luke were describing the same event, but that Matthew overlooked the second angel in his account.I still believe in the resurrection of Jesus Christ, even though Matthew wrote there was only one angel at the tomb, and Luke said there were 2 angels at the tomb when they went to see if Christ's body was still there. Did they go at separate times? The same time?