To: big'ol_freeper
...as opposed to sola scriptura which is explicitly mentioned. Believing in the Bible is hardly extra-Biblical.
39 posted on
05/26/2008 6:12:07 AM PDT by
Always Right
(Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
To: Always Right
Unless I understood you correctly, unless something is specifically mentioned in the Bible it is an invalid concept (your eg. no mention of orthodox). I assume then that you can readily document where the Bible specifically states sola scriptura.
40 posted on
05/26/2008 6:13:51 AM PDT by
big'ol_freeper
("Preach the Gospel always, and when necessary use words". ~ St. Francis of Assisi)
To: Always Right
You said: Believing in the Bible is hardly extra-Biblical.
Well, I prefer to “believe in” Jesus Christ. The Bible is the inspired Word of God not an idol to be “believed in”. That is bibliolatry.
Misinterpretation of the Bible or creating man-made traditions like sola scriptura is not extra-Biblical it is counter-Biblical.
44 posted on
05/26/2008 6:17:55 AM PDT by
big'ol_freeper
("Preach the Gospel always, and when necessary use words". ~ St. Francis of Assisi)
To: Always Right
Believing in the Bible is hardly extra-Biblical. But sola scriptura is.
88 posted on
05/26/2008 7:13:52 AM PDT by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson