To: big'ol_freeper
John: “...if these were to be described individually, I do not think the whole world would contain the books that would be written.”I never realized that the epistles contained so much additional information that was missing from the Gospels that the whole world was needed to contain them.
nice excerpt, but it is out of context and is not saying what you claim it says. Second off, it was true, then Catholic traditions would be just as inadequate.
218 posted on
05/26/2008 10:13:49 AM PDT by
Always Right
(Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
To: Always Right
Priceless. And completely wrong. I would be interested in your personal magisterial interpretation of that verse your personal magisterial context. I need a good laugh.
223 posted on
05/26/2008 10:20:41 AM PDT by
big'ol_freeper
("Preach the Gospel always, and when necessary use words". ~ St. Francis of Assisi)
To: Always Right
We don’t claim that the revelation is fully unpacked.
229 posted on
05/26/2008 10:27:41 AM PDT by
Mad Dawg
(Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
To: Always Right
John 21:25 speaks in a general sense, not to anything specific in the context.
235 posted on
05/26/2008 10:36:12 AM PDT by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson