To: John Leland 1789
No historical proof for a BC Septuagint; probably 200 AD. Same error made by Protestant seminaries. No Orthodox temple or synagogue would use a Greek OT. Why would the Jews of Christ day use one? But then claiming a BC Greek OT, you can only go back to 400 for your NT ?? That is because the Catholic NT came from Alexandria after 325 AD. It had been sitting being mutilated and corrupted by Origin and his ilk in N. Africa until Constantine ordered 50 copies of it, which ended up in Rome. Original? Not by a long shot. Byzantine/Antiochan NT copies were all over Asia Minor, along with a Latin OT (160 AD) long before that. Absolutely amazing. Are we expected to believe this?
101 posted on
05/26/2008 7:48:48 AM PDT by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
To: Petronski
Amazing. The use of Greek is more than a biblical fact, it is a historical fact. Again, the lengths one has to go to to free one’s mind to avoid the Truth.
113 posted on
05/26/2008 8:13:05 AM PDT by
big'ol_freeper
("Preach the Gospel always, and when necessary use words". ~ St. Francis of Assisi)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson