Freepers without denom affiliation but Christian (Caucus/Vanity)

rev911 ^ | 5/25/08 | rev911

[Revelation 911]

NNNNNNNNGGGGhhhh

for us "tweeners" who dont have a caucus

tweeners being Christians without a denomination who cant participate in any caucus threads

[Godzilla]

again, please accept my apology for the assumptions I made

Accepted oh cat herder.

[Revelation 911]

Along those lines, would bringing a commentary by an author who IS of a recognized Christian denomination into the conversation, as long as it isn't outright proselytizing? Thoughts?

sounds cool - hows that sound to the rest of the crew ?

You might ask the RM to keep an eye on the thread to enforce caucus rules, as S/he has a lot of experience at it, and could possibly make some suggestions.

done / pinged

[Revelation 911]

Accepted oh cat herder.

beats "drian bamage"

[restornu]

Are not you and your wife Methodist Ministers Rev 911?

[Revelation 911]

Are not you and your wife Methodist Ministers Rev 911?

wife remains free methodist, I mention my departure on another thread

Excepting your backdoor attempt to get this thread thrown out YOU ARE TRESPASSING

please leave

[greyfoxx39]

This is a caucus thread resty. You DO know what a caucus thread is, do you not?

[Revelation 911]

Are not you and your wife Methodist Ministers Rev 911?

wife remains free methodist, I mention my departure on another thread

Excepting your backdoor attempt to get this thread thrown out YOU ARE TRESPASSING

please leave

Caucus threads are closed to any poster who is not a member of the caucus

sorry, it is my understanding you are a Mormon, you are not welcome in this caucus

[greyfoxx39]

An addition by the RM I noticed on another thread to the caucus rules.

"Caucus threads are closed to any poster who is not a member of the caucus. If it says “Catholic Caucus” and you are not Catholic, do not post to the thread. However, if the poster of the caucus invites you, I will not boot you from the thread.

The “caucus” article and posts must not compare beliefs or speak in behalf of a belief outside the caucus.

[Admin Moderator]

Regarding your abuse report:

Revelation 911 at 05/26/2008 04:58 PM [complaint]
Regarding #44

mormon on a non denominational caucus thread

---

This thread is not funny and you’re pushing your luck. RM is not here right now and the AMs are less kind than he is. Don’t push your luck.

[Revelation 911]

ok, youve threatened me and I dont understand why - Its a non denominational thread - for those not having a denomination to participate - are we mis understanding each others terms ? -

by non denomination, I mean it to be a caucus thread for those who do not have a denomination -

I think youve misunderstood it to be nondenominational in the sense that there a no denomination distinctive required to participate.

Now lacking a fair explanation - my exclamation that a mormon had disrupted the thread is completely fair -

the disruptor has a denomination - I dont and neither do a number of people

Is that a satisfactory explanation?