Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: PresbyRev

Um, no.

Sterility is not usually willed, and otherwise healthy, moral people who are sterile would be overjoyed if they conceived despite their apparent sterility.

Mutuality, love and concern for others which has been closed off to sharing those gifts with a third party are not fully healthy.


16 posted on 05/23/2008 9:17:31 PM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Philo-Junius

Your postulate that a third party must exist in a relationship of mutuality and care to be healthy is completely arbitrary and a non sequitor.

You view, then, as unhealthy, sex between a married couple who cannot conceive a child whatever the reason might be? Aristotle was liable to err you know.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0kJHQpvgB8


18 posted on 05/23/2008 9:34:17 PM PDT by PresbyRev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson