Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg
I agree with you about the Antichrist.

While the glove may not fit exactly, its still to close for comfort and the RCC stands defiantly on ground they should have never gotten near.

It seems that the reformers didn't have a problem calling someone an Antichrist even if they only remotely fit the description.

Maybe having the RCC out to kill them caused them jump to inaccurate conclusions.
(If I was around back then, I would have probably agreed with them)
334 posted on 05/23/2008 3:36:00 PM PDT by Fichori (Official Tarbaby of the RF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]


To: Fichori; DaveMSmith; Petronski; trisham; wagglebee; sitetest; sandyeggo
Regarding your comment on antichrist.

Dear Friend,scripture says what an antichrist is ,which there are many, is described in 1 John 2:22

“”Who is a liar, but he who denieth that Jesus is the Christ? This is Antichrist, who denieth the Father, and the Son.”” 1 John 2:22

Take a look at what this Guy John F Mac Arthur teaches

From MacArthur's Bible study guide, The Superiority of Christ

“”the terms ‘Father’ and ‘Son’ would have no significance before the incarnation.” -Page 5

“”Did you know that when 2 Samuel was written, Jesus Christ was not the Son of God? Why? The title Son refers to Jesus Christ in His incarnation. Christ did not become the Son until He was begotten into time.”” -page 52

Here is more from Mac Arthur...

Some 900 years before Jesus was born God prophesied, “I will be a Father to Him, and He shall be a Son to Me” (Heb.1:5; 2 Sam. 7:14), indicating that in eternity past that, though there were always three persons in the Trinity, there were not yet the roles of Father and Son. Those designations apparently came into being only at the incarnation. In the announcement of Jesus’ birth to Mary, the angel Gabriel declared, “He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High;...the holy offspring shall be called the Son of God” [Luke 1:32,35]. Son was a new name, never before applied to the second person of the Godhead except prophetically, as in Psalm 2:7, which is interpreted in Hebrews 1:5-6 as referring to the event of His incarnation. John wrote, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” (John 1:1). Only when “the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us” as “the only begotten God” (John 1:14,18) did He take on the role and function of Son [emphasis his]. [John MacArthur, Jr., The MacArthur New Testament Commentary—Galatians (Chicago: Moody Press, 1987), p.108 (see his comments under Galatians 4:4).]

350 posted on 05/24/2008 2:15:17 PM PDT by stfassisi ( ("Above all gifts that Christ gives his beloved is that of overcoming self"-St Francis Assisi))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson