Posted on 05/17/2008 4:15:27 PM PDT by NYer
ST. LOUIS — When Anglicans and Catholics agreed in May 2005 that Marian dogmas were consonant with Scripture, few guessed the accord would signal a veritable Marian regeneration.
Yet, in the nearly three years that have followed, the increasing acceptance of Mary among Christians has been witnessed in everything from theology to pop culture.
The 2006 sleeper hit The Nativity Story, for instance — widely acclaimed by Catholics and Protestants alike — was written by Mike Rich, a nondenominational Christian.
“From the standpoint of ecumenism, the subject of Mary is one we can speak about with a number of groups we’re in dialogue with,” said Lawrence Welch, associate professor of systematic theology at Kenrick-Glennon seminary in St. Louis. He has served on Vatican committees on ecumenism.
“It’s cautious, and among some it’s still taboo,” Welch added, “but there is openness to speak about Mary’s role in salvation history and in the life of Jesus.”
Mary’s inspiration has been most spectacular, however, in the process of conversion.
>In a move that amazed evangelical Protestants and Catholics alike, and continues to rock Christian blogs, Francis Beckwith resigned his high-profile post as president of the Evangelical Theological Society, revealing that he was returning to full communion with the Catholic Church.
That was in May 2007. Providentially, May has long been held in the Church as a particular month of devotion to the Blessed Mother.
Now associate professor of philosophy and Church studies at Baylor University, Beckwith cited an easing of reactionary tendencies among Christians as a chief pathway to reconciliation.
“Many Protestants are asking: Can we honor Mary in a way that’s not so adoring as Catholics but acknowledges that she was the greatest Christian?” he said. “I would speculate that this movement is responding to the accusations against Christ’s divinity by liberal scholars.”
That quest for the “historical Jesus,” which is associated recently with researchers like dissidents John Dominic Crossan and Marcus Borg of the Jesus Seminar, does not accept the dogma of Christ’s two natures in one person, which was defined at the council of Chalcedon in 451.
“Interestingly, a huge increase of Marian devotion occurs right after Chalcedon,” Beckwith noted. “Cardinal Newman was right: The necessity of the Immaculate Conception protects the Church from second-guessing Christ’s divinity and humanity; it protects us against Docetism and Arianism. Evangelicals are realizing this and asking: Do we want to pass this uncertainty to the next generation?”
Church Fathers
Clear about the Mariology he wishes to pass to his students, Daniel Akin, president of the Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, preached at Christmastime on the Magnificat, Mary’s hymn of adoration found in the first chapter of Luke.
“Mary is a great lady, a wonderful wife and mother, and a hero in the faith,” he said. “We as Christians should be grateful and rejoice in her life.”
Akin was wary, though, of what he perceives as excessive devotion to Mary.
“If she were with us today, she’d be scandalized by the way some have elevated her,” he said. “There is no indication in Scripture that she was sinless. She was a sinner, like the rest of us, who needed to be saved by her son.”
That same debate raged back in the fifth century, when St. Leo the Great wrote hundreds of sermons and letters defending Mary Immaculate. In particular, letter No. 28, popularly known as The Tome, led inexorably to that famous declaration at Chalcedon, which included a definition of Mary’s undefiled virginity.
“I’m familiar with Leo’s Tome,” commented Akin. “I think the language there and what the council used is confusing, and I do not agree with Leo’s interpretations.”
Until recently, an open discussion of St. Leo’s work would be a rarity at best. But Kenrick-Glennon’s Welch pointed out that the resurgence of interest in patristics — the theology of the Church Fathers, who wrote in the first six centuries of the Church — has led to greater dialogue among Christians on a range of topics.
“I’ve seen great interest in my book on St. Cyril of Alexandria from evangelicals,” he noted, “maybe even more activity recently than from Catholics.”
And as they turn to the Church Fathers, more Protestants are beginning to work out Marian theology in dialogue with Catholics.
“I recently had a public dialogue with Timothy George, founding dean of Beeson Divinity School, which is Baptist,” Beckwith reported. “We’re both familiar with Scot McKnight’s book (The Real Mary: Why Evangelical Christians Can Embrace the Mother of Jesus), and George is at work on his own book on Mary.”
Naturally, then, Protestants have returned to the Church Fathers with renewed vigor to understand the devotion proper to Mary.
Jim Anderson, assistant director of the Coming Home Network International, encountered in his studies a class dedicated to the subject team-taught by a Presbyterian and an Eastern Orthodox. “I was Methodist, and then a Lutheran, but that course on the early Church removed a lot of hurdles for me.”
Now a Catholic working with Marcus Grodi, the former Presbyterian pastor who hosts EWTN’s “The Journey Home,” Anderson points to Mary as pivotal in the conversions he witnesses.
“To understand Christology you have to understand Mary,” he said. “Faith brought understanding for me, just as it has for a lot of our [formerly Protestant] clergy. True, the Holy Spirit works differently in different people’s hearts. But the numbers of people wanting to know more about the early Church and Mary is like a drumbeat that keeps getting louder and louder.”
Your interpretation of Matt 16:18 is the product of warped group think by a bunch of self interested dead men. Do RCs never get tired of regurgitating Rome’s lies?
St. Irenaeus, St. Athanasius, St. John Chrysostom, St. Peter, St. Paul, St. John, Martin Luther, St. Thomas Aquinas, et cetera ad infinitum.
All of them wrong, latest upstart storefront splinter group, right.
LOL
Don’t know about them folks except for Peter, Paul, and John - none of whom published anything that promotes the RCC fairy tales regarding Mary worship (deny it though the RCC does).
Thanks for the back -up, None so blind as those that will not see and them that have their ups up their rectums
You were speaking of Matthew 16:18. You’re changing it now to false charges of “Mary worship?”
The Catholic Church does not teach Mary worship. It specifically rejects it. Claims to the contrary are false witness.
“I read the Scripture and understand what it says -...”
In your own private views, sure. Your wilful blindness to the truth is evident to the rest of us though. Good luck.
THAT makes all CATHOLICS.....JEWS?
“For the fact that reformed teaching repudiates the pagan Mary worship that the RCC “
AH REALLY? Try to say to Samir GEAGEA (lebanese forces)
http://www.lebaneseforces.org/christ/rosary_cover.htm
THESE are “PAGAN WORSHIPPING” manifestations...
THE GOOD MAN WILL SHOOT YOU (probably).....
Manfred, my friend. Whatever you are reading and interpreting that allows you to have those reactions to fellow Chistians concerns me. The same way Rev. Wright, is wrong to me. I would suggest more of the New Testament as opposed to the Old. I pray that Jesus’ love and understanding blesses you.
I thank you for your kind words. I’m curious: what makes you think I spend more time in the OT than the NT?
Bear in mind that not who claim to be Christians are in Christ. Jeremiah Wright and Benny Hinn both claim to be Christians but both proclaim outrageous lies about what the Bible teaches.
To truly be a Christian, one must believe in the Biblical Christ - alone - for salvation. Doctrine that teaches people to work for salvation is heresy - as was demonstrated when Paul rebuked Jewish leaders for requiring works of the law for salvation (Romans 2:17 - 29).
The New Testament clearly shows a pattern given by Christ and His apostles: give the law to the proud, to reveal his sin; give grace to humble, as he is aware of his sin.
People who are prideful about their religious requirements of faith inherently disdain the Biblical message of grace.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.