It WAS doctored: the footnote numbers were removed.
And when a complaint was made that the footnotes had been removed (which most people do with footnote numbers) I reposted to INCLUDE the footnote numbers. AND I linked to the Vatican.va so that anyone with a computer could see the excerpt was straight from Rome.
The facts remain...
1) Netmilsmom has said my typing "Vatican.org" was NOT a typo, but intentional, and that I posted FROM "Vatican.org."
I would REALLY like Netmilsmom (or anyone) to show me how I could have posted ANYTHING from Vatican.org when that site DOES NOT EXIST.
2) Regardless of the footnotes, Netmilsmom labeled as a "lie" the actual words of the RCC catechism #460.
And on that, we agree.
All this ridiculous, combative reflexology simply underscores the legalistic nature of the RCC. God forbid we discuss the words of the catechism (for all to read in black and white.) Thus something must have been "doctored" because when read verbatim from the catechism the actual words the RCC is putting forth are as repellent to a lot of Catholics as they are to all Protestants.