Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: XeniaSt

You could not have view the post we are talking about. It’s post 140.

Here.
To: AnalogReigns; netmilsmom; Alex Murphy; Lord_Calvinus; Gamecock; OLD REGGIE; Uncle Chip; ...
Perhaps the answer is found in the RCC catechism itself...

“For the Son of man became man so that we might become God. The only begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods.” (page 116, #460)

No numbers, no link. Not cut and pasted from Vatican.va and refered to Vatican.org which is owned by a Canadian.


643 posted on 05/18/2008 12:50:03 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Ironmom. (but really made from Gold plated titanium))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies ]


To: netmilsmom

Notice in some posts the childish refusal to refer to the Catechism of the Catholic Church as such.

I genuinely pity those who will take no chance of—spare no circumlocution to avoid—paying even the slightest respect to the Catholic Church.

Fetish is definitely the most accurate word.


645 posted on 05/18/2008 12:56:35 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 643 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson