I gave the proper reference. It was the Catechism of the Catholic Church," and you questioned the catechism's veracity.
As well you should.
FWIW, I expect FReepers to do their own homework and not to mis-attribute words and motives to other FReepers carelessly (and certainly to apologize when that happens.) That was good advice given to me years ago on this forum, and it's still good advice.
Just think of all you've learned since you "searched the Scriptures (or catechism in your case) daily, (to learn) whether those things were so." (Acts 17:11.) Almost Berean of you.
It's also interesting to note that the site you linked to (a site you apparently didn't like) actually referenced the Catechism correctly!
lol.
They only reference made in post #387 by you is to the "Catechism of the Catholic Faith," which is NOT the proper reference.
...and you questioned the catechism's veracity.
No, she questioned YOUR reference to it.
>> not to mis-attribute words and motives<<
Really, I don’t have to mis-attribute words or motives to FReepers. They show how they are all the time. Most give a proper reference from the source, not another site quoting it, (or none at all as the original post was) because anything can be taken out of context, without the footnotes as the original site found by a google search proved. There really wouldn’t have been a probem at all if one cited the real reference, from the horses mouth, so to speak
As for the lecture, I’ve been around a while and both my parents have been gone for over 25 years. After years of listening to the most hateful people throw lectures to cover the vile, I’ve learned to look by it. One learns lots in years of experience.
Trust me, people’s motivations are not lost on me. Not mind reading, just past practice, as my wise father used to say.
Gotta go open the camper, Sister in Christ. So you’ll have to go on without me.