Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DR. PUSEY ON THE WORSHIP OF MARY IN THE CHURCH OF ROME
Sword and the Trowel ^ | 1866 | Charles Spurgeon

Posted on 05/14/2008 10:16:49 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg

Dr. Pusey on the Worship of Mary in the Church of Rome

by C. H. Spurgeon

From the January 1866 "Sword and Trowel Spurgeon"

According to promise, we have summarized the detailed account of the idolatrous worship of Mary by the Papists as exposed in full by Dr. Pusey in his new work. As his statements are not made at random, but are supported by quotations from Romish writers of recognised authority, they will be valuable to those who are met by the crafty denials of Romanists whenever they expose the genuine doctrines of Popish faith. Amid all the mischief which Pusey has done, it is well to note and acknowledge whatever service he may in this case render to truth. The headings of the paragraphs are ours; the quotations are given as they stand.

Blessings said to be obtained through Mary.

—"So, then, it is taught in authorized books, that 'it is morally impossible for those to be saved who neglect the devotion to the Blessed Virgin;' that 'it is the will of God that all graces should pass through her hands;' that 'no creature obtained any grace from God, save according to the dispensation of His holy Mother;' that Jesus has, in fact, said, 'no one shall be partaker of My Blood, unless through the intercession of My Mother;' that 'we can only hope to obtain perseverance through her;' that 'God granted all the pardons in the Old Testament absolutely for the reverence and love of this Blessed Virgin;' that 'our salvation is in her hand;' that 'it is impossible for any to be saved, who turns away from her, or is disregarded by her; or to be lost, who turns to her, or is regarded by her;' that 'whom the justice of God saves not, the infinite mercy of Mary saves by her intercession;' that God is 'subject to the command of Mary;' that 'God has resigned into her hands (if one might say so) His omnipotence in the sphere of grace;' that 'it is safer to seek salvation through her than directly from Jesus.'"

Mary worship held up as a cure for trouble.

—"F. Faber, in his popular books, is always bringing in the devotion to the Blessed Virgin.. He believes that the shortcomings of English Roman Catholics are owing to the inadequacy of their devotion to her. After instancing people's failures in overcoming their faults, want of devotion, unsubmission to God's special Providence for them, feeling domestic troubles almost-incompatible with salvation, and that 'for all these things prayer appears to bring so little remedy,' he asks, 'What is the remedy that is wanted? what is the remedy indicated by God himself? If we may rely on the disclosures of the saints, it is an immense increase of devotion to our Blessed Lady, but remember, nothing short of an immense one. Here, in England, Mary is not half enough preached. Devotion to her is low and thin and poor. It is frightened out of its wits by the sneers of heresy. It is always invoking human respect and carnal prudence, wishing to make Mary so little of a Mary, that Protestants may feel at ease about her. Its ignorance of theology makes it unsubstantial and unworthy. It is not the prominent characteristic of our religion which it ought to be. It has no faith in itself. Hence it is, that Jesus is not loved, that heretics are not converted, that the Church is not exalted; that souls, which might be saints, wither and dwindle; that the sacraments are not rightly frequented, or souls enthusiastically evangelized. Jesus is obscured, because Mary is kept in the background. Thousands of souls perish, because Mary is withheld from them. It is the miserable unworthy shadow which we call our devotion to the Blessed Virgin, that is the cause of all these wants and blights; these evils and omissions and declines. Yet, if we are to believe the revelations of the saints, God is pressing for a greater, wider, a stronger, quite another devotion to His Blessed Mother.'"

The Pope's whole reliance on the Virgin.

—In his Encyclical Letter of 1849, Pius IX wrote: "On this hope we chiefly rely, that the most Blessed Virgin—who raised the height of merits above all the choirs of Angels to the throne of the Deity, and by the foot of Virtue 'bruised the serpent's head,' and who, being constituted between Christ and His Church, and, being wholly sweet and full of graces, hath ever delivered the Christian people from calamities of all sorts and from the snares and assaults of all enemies and hath rescued them from destruction, and, commiserating our most sad and most sorrowful vicissitudes and our most severe straits, toils, necessities with that most large feeling of her motherly mind—will, by her most present and most powerful patronage with God, both turn away the scourges of Divine wrath wherewith we are afflicted for our sins, and will allay, dissipate the most turbulent storms of ills, wherewith, to the incredible sorrow of our mind, the Church everywhere is tossed, and will turn our sorrow into joy. For ye know very well, Ven. Brethren, that the whole of our confidence is placed in the most Holy Virgin, since God has placed in Mary the fullness of all good, that accordingly we may know that if there is any hope in us, if any grace, if any salvation, it redounds to us from her, because such is His will Who hath willed that we should have everything through Mary."

Mary blasphemously called Co-Redemptress with our Lord.

—"We had heard before, repeatedly, that she was the Mediatrix with the Redeemer; some of us, who do not read Marian books, have heard now for the first time, that she was ever our 'Co-Redemptress.' The evidence lies, not in any insulated passage of a devotional writer (which was alleged in plea for the language of M. Olier), but in formal answers from Archbishops and Bishops to the Pope as to what they desired in regard to the declaration of the Immaculate Conception as an Article of Faith. Thus the Archbishop of Syracuse wrote, 'Since we know certainly that she, in the fulness of time, was Co-redemptress of the human race, together with her Son Jesus Christ our Lord.' From North Italy the Bishop of Asti wrote of 'the dogma of the singular privilege granted by the Divine Redeemer to His pure mother, the Co-redemptress of the world.' In South Italy the Bishop of Gallipoli wrote, 'the human race, whom the Son of God, from her, redeemed; whom, together with Him, she herself co-redeemed.' The Bishop of Cariati prayed the Pope to 'command all the sons of Holy Mother Church and thy own, that no one of them should dare at any time hereafter to suspect as to the Immaculate Conception of their Co-redeemer.' From Sardinia, the Bishop of Alghero wrote, 'It is the common consent of all the faithful, and the common wish and desire of all, that our so beneficent Parent and Co-redeemer should be presented by the Apostolic See with the honour of this most illustrious mystery.' Spain, the Bishop of Almeria justified the attribute by appeal to the service of the Conception. The Church, adapting to the Mother of God in the Office of the Conception that text, 'Let Us make a help like unto Him,' assures us of it. and confirms those most ancient traditions, 'Companion of the Redeemer,' 'Co-Redemptress,' 'Authoress of everlasting salvation.' The Bishops refer to. these as ancient, well-known, traditionary titles, at least in their Churches in North and South Italy, Sicily, Sardinia, Spain."

A Parallel infamously drawn between Jesus and Mary.

—"As our Redemption gained its sufficiency and might from Jesus, so, they say, did it gain its beauty and loveliness from the aid of Mary. As we are clothed with the merits of Christ, so also, they say, with the merits of Mary. As Jesus rose again the third day without seeing corruption, so they speak of her Resurrection so as to anticipate corruption, in some three days;' as He was the first-fruits of them that slept, so is she; as He was taken up into heaven in the body so, they say, was she; as He sits at the Right Hand of God, so she at His Right Hand; as He is there our perpetual Intercessor with the Father, so she with Him; as 'no man cometh to the Father.' Jesus saith, 'but by Me;' so 'no man cometh to Jesus', they say, 'but by her;' as He is our High Priest, so she, they say, a Priestess; He, our High Priest, gave us the sacrament of His Body and Blood; so, they say, did she, 'her will conspiring with the will of her Son to the making of the Eucharist, and assenting to her Son so giving and offering Himself for food and drink, since we confess that the sacrifice and gifts, given, to us under the form of bread and wine, are truly hers and appertain unto her. As in the Eucharist He is present and we receive Him, so she, they say, is present an received in that same sacrament. The priest is 'minister of Christ,' and 'minister of Mary.' They seem to assign to her an office, like that of God the Holy Ghost, in dwelling in the soul. They speak of 'souls born not of blood, nor of flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God and Mary;' that 'the Holy Ghost chose to make use of our Blessed Lady to bring His fruitfulness into action by producing in her and by her Jesus Christ in His members;' that 'according to that word, 'the kingdom of God is within you,' in like manner the kingdom of our Blessed Lady is principally in the interior of a man, his soul; that 'when Mary has struck her roots in the soul, she produces there marvels of grace, which she alone can produce, because she alone is the fruitful Virgin, who never has had, and never will have, her equal in purity and fruitfulness.'"

Shameless declaration that Mary is in the Eucharist.

—(Oswald.) "'We maintain a (co-)presence of Mary in the Eucharist. This is a necessary inference from our Marian theory, and we shrink back from no consequence.' 'We are much inclined,' he says afterwards, 'to believe an essential co-presence of Mary in her whole person, with body and soul, under the sacred species. Certainly to such a presence in the Eucharist, 1. there is required a glorious mode of being of the Virgin body of the Holy Mother. We are not only justified in holding this as to Mary, but we have well-nigh proved it. 2. The assumption of a bodily presence of Mary in the Eucharist compels self-evidently the assumption of a multi-location (i.e. a contemporaneous presence in different portions of space) of Mary, according to her flesh too. 3. One who would receive this must be ready to admit a compenetration of the Body of Christ and of that of the Virgin in the same portion of space, i.e. under the sacred species.' The writer subsequently explains that 'the "lac virginale" must be looked upon as that of Mary, which is primarily present in the Eucharist, whereto, in further consequence, the whole Christ the Head, the Blessed Virgin is, as also her soul, would be joined.' 'The Blood of the Lord, and the lac of His Virgin Mother, are both present in the sacrament.'"

Mariolotry to swallow up all other devotion.

—"'Assuming that, in and under Christ the Head, the Blessed Virgin is, after her Assumption, as it were, the neck of the Church, so that all grace whatever flows to the Body through her, that is, through her prayers, it might be argued, that, for such as have this belief to ask anything of or through her, is identical in sense, but in point of form better, than to ask it directly of Christ, in like manner as to ask anything of or through Christ, is identical in sense, but clearer and fuller in point of form, than to ask it directly of the Father. And hence, it might seem that it would bean improvement, if, reserving only the use of the appointed forms for the making of the Sacraments, and an occasional use of the Lord's Prayer (and this rather from respect to the letter of their outward institution than from any inward.199 necessity or propriety), every prayer, both of individuals and of the Church, were addressed to or through Blessed Mary, a form beginning, 'Our Lady, which art in heaven,' etc., being preferred for general use to the original letter of the Lord's Prayer; and the Psalter, the Te Deum, and all the daily Offices, being used in preference with similar accommodation.'" Horrid ravings of Faber, whose writings are very popular among Papists.—"'There is some portion of the Precious Blood which once was Mary's own blood, and which remains still in our Blessed Lord, incredibly exalted by its union with His Divine Person, yet still the same. This portion of Himself, it is piously believed, has not been allowed to undergo the usual changes of human substance. At this moment, in heaven, He retains something which was once His Mother's, and which is, possibly, visible, as such, to the saints and angels. He vouchsafed at mass to show to S. Ignatius the very part of the Host which had once belonged to the substance of Mary. It may have a distinct and singular beauty in heaven, where, by His compassion, it may one day be our blessed lot to see it and adore it. But with the exception of this portion of it, the Precious Blood was a growing thing,' "&c.

Enough! enough! every one of our readers will cry out, and therefore we stay our hand. Surely "for this cause, God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: that they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness."


TOPICS: Apologetics; History; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: bearingfalsewitness; correctworship; nottrue; openthread; scripture; theology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 1,001-1,013 next last
To: narses; Dr. Eckleburg
The important thing is that this is a strawman argument falsely claiming that the Church “worships” Mary and then slamming the Church for doing so. The EXACT same kind of lie that Jack Chick and many other haters tell. It is false to fact. It is a lie.

Are these words from Father Manelli also a lie:

"The words "dear Coredemptrix" express most exactly soteriological value of the Blessed Virgin Mary’s maternal mission in the tones of a pure theologia cordis. She coredeemed humanity by offering the divine Victim, her Son Jesus, in the bloody immolation of the Cross, and co-immolating herself with Him in order to "restore supernatural life to souls" (LG 61), became in this way our "Mother in the order of grace" (LG 1.c.) (18). She "gave birth to us in sorrows," affirms St. Pio. She is, therefore, the Mother Coredemptrix." [Padre Pio amd Mary Coredemptrix]

Is there anything there that you disagree with???

581 posted on 05/16/2008 4:42:44 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius
You may still think that our veneration of Mary and the saints is exaggerated and misplaced but it is hardly the same as the worship we give to God, and to God alone.

And when children in Catholic schools crown statues of Mary as Queen of Heaven this May in festivals all over the world, what should we, they, and you call that????

582 posted on 05/16/2008 5:07:16 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
There is no reason one cannot both defend doctrine and identify bigotry.

Not seeing much defense of the worship of Mary.

583 posted on 05/16/2008 5:21:56 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Obamafeld, "A CAMPAIGN ABOUT NOTHING".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
And when children in Catholic schools crown statues of Mary as Queen of Heaven this May in festivals all over the world, what should we, they, and you call that????

I would call it an expression of love for our blessed Mother. No one--I say again no one--is claiming that she is equal to God, she is the Queen Mother, i.e. the mother of the King, Jesus Christ. I would not think that you would object to us loving Mary, whom our Lord loves so very much. Is it wrong that we should express publicly our love for her? Perhaps to your sensibilities it is over the top, but take it for what it is and do not give it a meaning beyond what is our intention. Criticize what to you are our excesses but to insist that we are worshipping Mary as a god or attributing to her divine attributes when you have been repeatedly told that we do not is an exaggeration of your own and a slander against what we believe.

584 posted on 05/16/2008 5:23:56 AM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic
But you have already proven my point.

Pointing out idolatry does not make me a hater of the idolator. Your only hope is that I will retreat because you are using those terrible words at me. Do you think John the Babtist or Jesus would care about such a tactic? No, they called a spade a spade.

585 posted on 05/16/2008 5:24:29 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Obamafeld, "A CAMPAIGN ABOUT NOTHING".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

His words are not (a) worship or (b) doctrinal teaching of the Catholic Church.


586 posted on 05/16/2008 5:25:17 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 581 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
Pointing out idolatry does not make me a hater of the idolator.

False accusations of idolatry are not motivated by love.

587 posted on 05/16/2008 5:27:29 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 585 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
Not seeing much defense of the worship of Mary.

You're wrong to expect it. "Worship of Mary" is not Catholic teaching or practice.

588 posted on 05/16/2008 5:29:23 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies]

To: Quix
It does seem to be a compulsive refles of a certain minority subgroup of a subgroup hereon.

Yeah but now I'm in big trouble because I think I used the word "you". GASP!!!

589 posted on 05/16/2008 5:29:40 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Obamafeld, "A CAMPAIGN ABOUT NOTHING".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
His words are not (a) worship or (b) doctrinal teaching of the Catholic Church.

Did he say those things before or after he was made a "Saint"? By making him a "Saint" the Vatican has given official sanction to his words.

And how about you??? Do you disagree with his words????

590 posted on 05/16/2008 5:32:00 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 586 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; netmilsmom; OpusatFR; Gamecock; 1000 silverlings; Petronski; big'ol_freeper

“far no proof has been offered for the statement that any Calvinist believes in reincarnation.
In fact, a quick tally of the many Calvinists on FR shows none of them believes in reincarnation.”

Well, I’m used to sleeping at night. I can’t make a 24 hour posting schedule.

“The relationship between predestination and free will is the key to understanding life and the Bible. Ignorance of how our own past has created our present keeps us shackled to error, possessing little more that the illusion of choice, freedom, and free will. Every Christian church today teaches the tenets of reincarnation; it is preached from evangelical pulpits and is the core of Calvinism. Once understood, it is the foundation of all biblically based teachings.”

http://v.webring.com/t/The-Paradox-of-Choice-vs-Free-Will-and-TheWay

*******Calvinists believe in the Hindu belief in Karma. It’s obvious from Calvin’s words*******:

With Augustine I say: the Lord has created those whom he unquestionably foreknew would go to destruction. This has happened because he has willed. Bk 3, Ch 23, s. 5

“Again I ask: whence does it happen that Adam’s fall irremediably involved so many peoples, together with their infant offspring, in eternal death unless because it so pleased God? ... The decree is dreadful indeed, I confess. Yet no one can deny that God foreknew what end man was to have before he created him, and consequently fore knew because he so ordained by his decree.” “And it ought not to seem absurd for me to say that God not only foresaw the fall of the first man, and in him the ruin of his descendants, but also meted it out in accordance with his own decision.. Bk 3, Ch 23, s. 7

“...salvation is freely offered to some while others are barred from access to it..” Bk 3, Ch 21, s. 5

“We call predestination God’s eternal decree, by which he compacted with himself what he willed to become of each man. For all are not created in equal condition; rather, eternal life is fore-ordained for some, eternal damnation for others.” Bk 3, ch 21, s. 5

“The very inequality of his grace proves that it is free.” Bk 3, ch 21, s 6

“..we say that God once established by his eternal and unchangeable plan those whom he long before determined once for all to receive into salvation, and those whom, on the other hand, he would devote to destruction. ...he has barred the door of life to those whom he has given over to damnation.” Bk 3, Ch 21, s. 7

Then there is this exposition from a class at Florida State:

http://www.fsu.edu/~crimdo/demon.html

2. “Divine providence (predestination): We are born good or evil (bad seed). Criminals are part of all communities, as saints and sinners are forced to live together. Ultimately it is all part of God’s plan, established before the first human ever appeared on earth. If this sounds like Calvinism, as we discussed the first night of class, you’re right. A Calvinistic God is all powerful, all knowing, and ultimately inscrutable.
The idea of divine providence leads to many questions. Is God the author of evil as well as good? Why would God choose certain persons for divine bliss while others are destined for eternal damnation? Is there nothing human beings can do about their fate? However, Calvin forbade even asking these questions. Questioning God is the ultimate blasphemy.

What would the followers of Calvin do? Would they follow Calvin’s admonition not to question providence? Of course not! Max Weber has described the results of the quest to know one’s fate in one of the most famous history texts ever written The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Calvin’s followers quickly realized that to live in a world in which one’s life decisions had no impact on one’s ultimate outcome was to live in an absurd world. One could lie, cheat, and steal and still end up in heaven. On the other hand, God might reject even a virtuous person because they were not “chosen.” Calvinists believed that God was not a trickster (unlike Woody Allen’s view of God in Love and Death), and would not fool believers into thinking they were saved. The sign of God’s election chosen by Calvinists was success in a worldly occupation. The idea of “work as a calling” was borrowed from Martin Luther, who exhorted believers not to leave their current jobs for religious occupations (becoming a priest or nun). The inadvertent result of the Calvinist creation of the Protestant work ethic was the establishment of capitalism. With renewed devotion to work, the self-fulfilling prophecy was success in business.

One unfortunate consequence of the Protestant ethic was a flip-flop in Western attitudes toward the poor.”

It is Karma again. It’s in the tenets.

Here it is in Sola Scriptura:

“In My House are many mansions”

“The episode in the Bible where Jesus identified John the Baptist as the reincarnation of Elijah the prophet is one of the clearest statements which Jesus made concerning reincarnation.

For all the prophets and the law have prophesied until John. And if you are willing to receive it, he is Elijah who was to come. (Matt. 11:13-14)

In the above passage, Jesus clearly identifies John the Baptist as the reincarnation of Elijah the prophet. Later in Matthew’s gospel Jesus reiterates it.

And the disciples asked him, saying, “Why then do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?”

But he answered them and said, “Elijah indeed is to come and will restore all things. But I say to you that Elijah has come already, and they did not know him, but did to him whatever they wished. So also shall the Son of Man suffer at their hand.”

Then the disciples understood that he had spoken of John the Baptist.” (Matt. 17:10-13)

“After six days Jesus took Peter, James and John with him and led them up a high mountain, where they were all alone. There he was transfigured before them. His clothes became dazzling white, whiter than anyone in the world could bleach them. And there appeared before them Elijah and Moses, who were talking with Jesus ...

As they were coming down the mountain, Jesus gave them orders not to tell anyone what they had seen until the Son of Man had risen from the dead.

They kept the matter to themselves, discussing what “rising from the dead” meant.

And they asked him, “Why do the teachers of the law say that Elijah must come first?”

Jesus replied, “To be sure, Elijah does come first, and restores all things.”

“Why then is it written that the Son of Man must suffer much and be rejected?”

“But I tell you, Elijah has come, and they have done to him everything they wished, just as it is written about him.” (Mark 9:9-13)”

Quite literal, isn’t it?

Besides, I know people who do yoga at the psychic research center here. One of my friend is an instructor there. She knows women in her class are Calvinists. They repeat the Hindu blessings during postures.

“In fact, a quick tally of the many Calvinists on FR shows none of them believes in reincarnation.

So we can only surmise this untrue remark was said for some other, unknown purpose.”

I certainly didn’t say YOU believed in reincarnation and karma although Calvin fits perfectly, but I’m sure that many Calvinists have a Karmic attitude. It’s all very Hindu.


591 posted on 05/16/2008 5:34:11 AM PDT by OpusatFR (Internet Torquemada of FR. Trip over yourself at your own risk. I don't answer some posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
By making him a "Saint" the Vatican has given official sanction to his words.

Bzzzt. Wrong.

That's ridiculous.

592 posted on 05/16/2008 5:34:32 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 590 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
False accusations of idolatry are not motivated by love.

But true ones are which is why Jesus pointed out error.

593 posted on 05/16/2008 5:35:11 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Obamafeld, "A CAMPAIGN ABOUT NOTHING".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
You're wrong to expect it. "Worship of Mary" is not Catholic teaching or practice.

You could say that if it weren't so well documented in this article and a thousand other ones. Read DeMontforte. Few Christians express the worship of God with the eloquence that he worships Mary.

594 posted on 05/16/2008 5:36:30 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Obamafeld, "A CAMPAIGN ABOUT NOTHING".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 588 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
However, Calvin forbade even asking these questions. Questioning God is the ultimate blasphemy.

Poor Jean Cauvin....confusing himself with God again.

Those questions are not "questioning God," but rather "questioning the autocratic Jean Cauvin."

595 posted on 05/16/2008 5:37:01 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 591 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

YOU are not Jesus.


596 posted on 05/16/2008 5:37:27 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
YOU are not Jesus.

Read what He says about being like Him.

597 posted on 05/16/2008 5:40:09 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Obamafeld, "A CAMPAIGN ABOUT NOTHING".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 596 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
You could say that if it weren't so well documented in this article and a thousand other ones.

THIS article is not well-documented, let alone the apocryphal "thousand other ones."

Read DeMontforte. Few Christians express the worship of God with the eloquence that he worships Mary.

Even if I assume everything you say about him is true, DeMontforte does not define Catholic teaching or practice.

598 posted on 05/16/2008 5:40:16 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 594 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
Read what He says about being like Him.

He does not call any of us to make false charges against His Church.

599 posted on 05/16/2008 5:41:20 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Even if I assume everything you say about him is true, DeMontforte does not define Catholic teaching or practice.

He is just one of many that worship Mary in his own way. He also has popes make pilgrmages to his grave which is a pretty strong statement of acceptance of his views.

600 posted on 05/16/2008 5:41:51 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Obamafeld, "A CAMPAIGN ABOUT NOTHING".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 1,001-1,013 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson