[Religion Moderator]

What you will see on these ecumenical threads is exactly what went on on the first "respectful dialogue thread" one. Disrupters will take up their little posts and lie in wait for anyone that they happen to disagree with.

I don't think so - the "cut" here is very easy to understand. No "anti" posts on "ecumenic" threads. In the "respectful dialog" attempt there was no agreement as to what was or was not "respectful."

[1000 silverlings]

Yes, but who will decide just what “anti” is. On the other thread, everybody and his cousin decided what was “disrespectful”, so much so that the whole thread was just disruptful, no one could post anything. Even Alamo girl was “disrespectful” which was ridiculous.

[Quix]

I agree.

I think ANTI-

is a much clearer and easier to enforce boundary.

We shall see.