Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Religion Moderator
The lurkers know the differences run very deep.

OK, I follow you here so far. Many instances key words/ideas / concepts are shared by these vastly different groups with vastly different definitions. The Rabbi says that the promise was through Isaac while the Mullah would say it was through Ishmael - it would appear that they would either have to talk past each other, or eventually define what is meant by these common terms. This process of definition does not happen in a vacuum, but in response to a preceding post. How are you going to handle this process given that the context of the thread will make it very clear that this is in response and counter to another post - which by your definitions would border on an attack?

144 posted on 05/14/2008 11:33:59 AM PDT by Godzilla (I'm out of my mind, but feel free to leave a message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: Godzilla
If you need to define a word to post the belief you are "for" on an ecumenic thread, then do so. An academic definition of a word is not arguing "against" another's beliefs. For instance:

"Redeem" means "to atone" (Merriam Webster)

I believe ...


147 posted on 05/14/2008 11:41:43 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson