Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Zionist Conspirator
Moreover whatever "Khazars" or "Sabbatians" there are are more likely to be found among Levantine Sefaradim than among European 'Ashkenazim.
Um, no. Get a map.
Actually, the only group likely to be Khazars are the few remaining Crimean Karaylar (Karaite Tatars) and all-but extinct Kyrmchaks (Rabbinate Tatars).
I suppose that some could have remained in the area as it went from Mongol/Tatar domination to Ottoman suzerainty and then travelled withing the Ottoman Empire. But there is no evidence of this. On the other hand names like Qaplan (tiger) and and, God help us, Kaganovich (son of the Khagan), are Ashkenazi.

Some Sabbateans became Turks after the converted to Islam. Some crypto-Sabbateans became "Donme", but they have nothing to do with Khazars.

"This is the truth. But most people who spout the "'Ashkenazim aren't real Jews" line simply want to believe this and cannot be persuaded otherwise. "
Entirely try. Kevin Brooks refuted the argument before the genetic information was in, but antisemites have the gall to cite his book as a source, while ignoring its content.

36 posted on 05/14/2008 10:17:30 PM PDT by rmlew (Down with the ersatz immanentization of the eschaton known as Globalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: rmlew

Thanks for the corrections. I didn’t mean to mislead anyone. My intention was to defend the ‘Ashkenazim, who are so often accused of being “Khazars” or not “real Israelites.”


38 posted on 05/15/2008 7:57:57 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Uqera'tem deror ba'aretz lekhol-yosheveyha . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson