“Your need to sit down and reread what you just wrote and see the childishness and unwarranted defensiveness that abounds.”
Every single thing I said in that post was a statement of fact. Nothing more.
“I do have a problem with anyone’s *closed caucus*.”
Go back and read the article, I was talking about creating open threads.
“I’d be interested in knowing what other feel about paying for your venerability and privacy.”
Well, I can’t really speak for those others officially, but I imagine that if they were the kind who valued freedom of speech and freedom of religion for ALL people, they would have no problem with FR upholding and practicing those values. Those who think that freedom of religion and speech should be reserved for those of the ‘right’ religion probably are not too keen on it.
I was talking about *closed threads or caucuses* Those can and should be done elsewhere at the expence of those involved, IMO. Sorry if I misunderstood.
Plus, isn’t there some limitation to the amount of words in the body of a thread? If so, that rule has been abused by several different religion posters.