Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: pby
I guess "it has been shown/documented" doesn't quite do it for me. I don't oppose the opinion, I simply have no independent notion to agree or disagree with it.

I've seen the studies that talk about census figures, but they are from 1890 and beyond. I don't dispute them.

In the 1800s the legal age was as low as twelve years old for females

An interesting but limited study of a geneological site, showing "average" and earliest ages for the last 5 centuries.

I doubt that the "average" marriage age was ever much into the teen years, because of statistics. Suppose the average age was 18. For that to be true, for each woman of age 40 who gets married, you need to have 11 16-year-olds get married.

The median age would be more informative than mean, but I doubt the median age was all that young either.

But I also have no problem believing the age of marriage was much lower than it is today.

86 posted on 05/06/2008 2:55:31 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
The historical statistics show that it was not normative for 14 year old girls to marry in the 19th century...

Be wishy-woshy about mean, average (same thing), or median...It doesn't matter. It was not typical, or regular, or normative, or standard, or commonplace throughout 19th century society for young teenage girls to marry...

And, yet...it was quite commonplace, normative, standard, regular among the LDS society. JUST LIKE THE FLDS, TODAY.

89 posted on 05/06/2008 3:04:18 PM PDT by pby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson