I've seen hundreds. I see UFOs on a weekly basis. Things in the sky which I'm unable to identify. Most are probably planes, satellites, balloons, asteroids, comets, stars, birds etc., but I'm unable to know for certain what they are.
Note that I'm not using the term UFO synonymously with the phrase "something which looks like an alien spaceship". I'm using it in its literal sense; an aerial object of uncertain identity.
Why the rush to assume that these objects must be sinister and/or extraplanetary?
Anyway, sighting a "UFO" is meaningless. I want a primary relic.....something tangible left behind as hard evidence which can be scientifically analyzed. Ya know.....like a broken dematerialization chamber, a jettisoned warp speed accelerator, or a busted radiation shield. Such things should exist and start to appear if visits by our extraterrestrial cousins are as common as some would have us believe, no?
It’s no rush.
Such craft and critters have been mutilating cattle and other animals; abducting and forcing sexual eperiences, taking body samples; implanting ID marker etc. modules in folks; and even mutilating people the same way they do cattle for most of the last 60 years . . . some say well before that.
So you've never seen a UFO...Why bother to comment then???
I’ve posted my notes on the AZTEC CONF thread from March 08 . . . one presentation was on the WELL OVER 3,000 cases with tangible, measureable evidence left on the ground, vegitation etc. from the craft’s being there.