Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: thefrankbaum
Thanks for the compliment on the analogy. The analogy applies to any other church as well - because the map is accurate.

We completely agree that Christ completed the sacrifice, for time eternal. However, I'm curious how you reconcile the teachings regarding the Eucharist that existed for 1500 years in both the Catholic and the Orthodox Churches? Were these Churches in error regarding the Eucharist the entire time? If yes, how do you reconcile that with Christ's promise that the gates of Hell would not prevail against His Church?

No, they weren't all in error regarding the eucharist the entire time. I have a quote from Eusebius of Caesarea (263 - 340 A.D.) that it's a memorial and commemoration if you'd like to see it.

But if a church (any church) teaches that there still needs to be a propitiatory sacrifice, the letter to the Hebrews says that's not the case.

68 posted on 05/03/2008 9:27:05 PM PDT by Bosco (Remember how you felt on September 11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Bosco
I would love your Eusebius quote. Especially to compare with these two quotes:

Also, the Church does not teach that there needs to be a new Sacrifice - we know Christ's death accomplished that. Instead, the Church teaches we all need to partake of Christ's Sacrifice, since it is an eternal Sacrifice. We need to eat the Sacrifical Lamb.

70 posted on 05/03/2008 9:37:49 PM PDT by thefrankbaum (Ad maiorem Dei gloriam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson