Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: lainie
If you’re implying that I’m trying to create trouble, I am completely offended.

No need to be offended.

But I do object to the deliberate attempt to blur the lines between religion and science by doing what can only be described as belief-driven science, which has a particular goal (in this case, support of the bible) rather than true scientific inquiry. The two are antithetical.

That articles ostensibly dealing with science are routinely posted in the Religion Forum doesn't help. We end up with a preponderance of people who operate from belief, rather than the scientific method, contributing scientifically uninformed opinions based largely or solely on religious belief.

I can't help but feel that this is good for neither religion nor science.

33 posted on 04/25/2008 12:57:42 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

It’s clear that you are impressed with your own ideas, but the fact is, some people presented a show, and the paper wrote an article, and it has to do with religious themes and scientific ones at the same time.

So it’s posted in the religion forum under the specific topic designed to carry such articles. Get over it.


34 posted on 04/25/2008 1:10:44 PM PDT by lainie ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson