Replies

Neither racism or Eugenics is synonymous with evolution. Spartans practiced eugenics long before anyone came up with an evolutionary theory and racism has been around from the beginning. Either eugenics or racism can seek refuge under the umbrella of the theory of evolution; just as they can seek religious or conspiratorial confirmation, but neither is substantiated by an understanding of the theory.

Yes, Hitler was big on the ‘international bankers’ and ‘conspiring to start world wars’ angle of antisemitism. Also all about the “Master Race” and against the ‘mongrelization’ of the ‘pure Aryan race’. He also spoke of avenging the “blood upon the cross”. All these are the very PUBLIC reasons given for Nazi's as to why they should hate Jews, never once did they say “we are all the descendants of apes, but WE are the SUPERIOR descendants of apes.” It just isn't what the audience was prepared to get behind, it isn't a good rallying cry, and it isn't what was used as a justification for the Holocaust.

I think the modern Eugenics was heavily influence by Darwin, however wrongly. It's founder was Francis Galton, (incidently Darwin's cousin):

An event that changed his [Galton] life was the publication by his cousin Charles Darwin of The Origin of Species in 1859. Galton was that came togripped by the work, especially the first chapter on "Variation under Domestication" concerning the breeding of domestic animals. He devoted much of the rest of his life to exploring its implications for human populations, which Darwin had only hinted at.
Source

Eugenics can be seen as applying Darwin to humans - again however wrongly.

Thanks for your reply.

Neither racism or Eugenics is synonymous with evolution.

So you say. Julian Huxley, the Darwin Medalist and co-founder of the Modern Synthesis said that 'evolutionary biology' is merely another word for eugenics.