Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: blue-duncan; Dr. Eckleburg; Mad Dawg; suzyjaruki; 1000 silverlings; wmfights; HarleyD
My request is entirely logical. We are not Calvinists. In fact, a good reason we are not is Calvinist rejection of the communion of saints and human cooperation with divine grace. So to tell me why veneration of Blessed Virgin Mary and the saints contradicts Calvinism treads water -- I agree that it does. An allegation that our devotions contradict scripture is one that I take seriously and I would like this slander to be substantiated honestly, or retracted. So far, al I get is more calvinist assuptions heaped on, -- no substantiation and no retraction.

Regarding the "blessed", indeed all these are blessings worthy of veneration. It is primarily through the example of the saints that we learn the Beatitudes.

The fact that Mary is chief among the saints comes not from her being simply "blessed", although that she most certainly is, but filled with grace, "kecharitomene" (I am sure the "doctor" has the proper phonics on that as well), -- as a Mother of God and Queen of Heaven, through whom the abundance of grace came to un in the person of Christ.

918 posted on 04/07/2008 1:33:21 PM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 910 | View Replies ]


To: annalex; Dr. Eckleburg; Mad Dawg; suzyjaruki; 1000 silverlings; wmfights; HarleyD

“An allegation that our devotions contradict scripture is one that I take seriously and I would like this slander to be substantiated honestly, or retracted. So far, al I get is more calvinist assuptions heaped on, — no substantiation and no retraction.”

You have had the scriptural subtantiation but you just don’t want to believe it, it’s your choice according to your free will. No retraction is necessary; just a difference of interpretation.

“The fact that Mary is chief among the saints comes not from her being simply “blessed”, although that she most certainly is, but filled with grace, “kecharitomene””

Well, Jesus was “full of grace” also, and we have received that fulness of grace from Him.

Jhn 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

Jhn 1:16 And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace.

Rom 5:15 But not as the offence, so also [is] the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, [which is] by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.

God is no respecter of persons and that has no scriptural exceptions. Even Mary must appear before the judgment seat of Christ and answer for her allotment of grace.

Act 10:34 Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:

Gal. 2:6, “(whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth no man’s person:)”

Eph. 6:9, “knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him.”

1 Pet. 1:17, “And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man’s work, pass the time of your sojourning here in fear”

2Cr 5:10, “For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things [done] in [his] body, according to that he hath done, whether [it be] good or bad.”


922 posted on 04/07/2008 2:23:05 PM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 918 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson