Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg
I see that my tactic wasn’t entirely successful: the RCC watchdogs are obsessed over the unknown author, avoiding discussion of the points made - which were in answer to a question.

I see no one here who is "obsessed over the unknown author" and I see no one "avoiding discussion of the points made."

There is merit in giving the source, who for all anyone knows may also have said the earth is flat. Credibility goes with the identity. To quote someone and fail to give the source could indicate the quoter is embarrassed about the source, or ashamed of him/her. It could also mean that the person quoted has embargoed using the material elsewhere, and the quoter is concealing that fact.

506 posted on 04/04/2008 8:34:15 AM PDT by Judith Anne (Don't just do something! Stand there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies ]


To: Judith Anne
Credibility goes with the identity. To quote someone and fail to give the source could indicate the quoter is embarrassed about the source, or ashamed of him/her.
513 posted on 04/04/2008 9:13:05 AM PDT by Petronski (Nice job, Hillary. Now go home and get your shine box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson