Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Religion Moderator; Gamecock
No one posted Jack Chick material. What was alluded to was the similarity of methods between what was posted here and his material.
The link in the second post was further indication of such methods by describing the corrosive influence of Jack Chick material in promoting hate. The link was describing an incident where school children in a Catholic Church found Jack Chick booklets in the missals.
The source was an editorial, not in any way connected with Chick. To say it is not allowed would be the same as to say you couldn't have an editorial that was negative about the KKK, Aryan Nations, National Alliance, VDare, etc. because it mentions their names.
Gamecock threw you a curve ball on this. If you read the posts he tried to say mentioning Jack Chick was not allowed.
Yet, this now suspect anti Catholic post from a possibly fraudulent source shares every hallmark of the same mentality as Jack Chick material.
Hope that clarifies it.
IrishCatholic
83 posted on 03/27/2008 9:44:20 PM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: IrishCatholic; Gamecock
Accusing another poster of Jack Chick-like conduct is as much a personal attack as accusing him of being a Nazi.

Hope that clarifies it.

RM

84 posted on 03/27/2008 9:47:45 PM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson