Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex
“Where, for example, is it written that the Bible contains one book but not another? Re-read the article, please - you can do better than that.”

I read the article and many others just like it. The early church that had the original documents “heard” the Holy Spirit in the writings and were convinced as to their authenticity. Through reading, they believed that the Scriptures they had were the very words of God himself and they were able to distinguish the authentic from the spurious. It is as Jesus said in John 10:27: “My sheep hear my voice and they follow me”. The fixing of the “canon” some two to three hundred years later did not authenticate the books of the bible, but merely cataloged them.

47 posted on 03/24/2008 8:57:20 PM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: blue-duncan
The early church that had the original documents “heard” the Holy Spirit in the writings

Ah, thanks. This is a Catholic statement, unlike that Calvin's self-authentication nonsense. This, of course, also validates the Deuterocanon.

50 posted on 03/24/2008 9:22:48 PM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson