Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Zionist Conspirator
So you despise people who actually believe their sacred texts and the the words of their rituals, but you respect hypocrites who but on ancient robes and intone ancient words which they don't believe in?

I despise no one - I have compassion for all people who struggle with these topics. Alan Watts describes fundamentalism best:

***********

"Religions are divisive and quarrelsome. They are a form of one-upmanship because they depend upon separating the "saved" from the "Damned", the true believers from the heretics, the in-group from the out-group. Even religious liberals play the game of "we're-more-tolerant-than-you." Furthermore, as systems of doctrine, symbolism, and behavior, religions harden into institutions that must command loyalty, be defended, and kept "pure", and - because all belief is fervent hope, and thus a cover-up for doubt and uncertainty - religions must make converts. The more people who agree with us, the less nagging insecurity about our position. In the end one is committed to being a Christian or a Buddhist come what may in the form of new knowledge. New and indigestible ideas have to be wangled into the religious tradition, however inconsistent with its original doctrines, so that the believer can still take his stand and assert, "I am first and foremost a follower of Christ/Mohammed/Buddha, or whomever." Irrevocable commitment to any religion is not only intellectual suicide; it is positive unfaith because it closes the mind to any new vision of the world. Faith is, above all, openness - an act of trust in the unknown.

"An ardent Jehovah's Witness once tried to convince me that if there were a God of love, he would certainly provide mankind with a reliable and infallible textbook for the guidance of conduct. I replied that no considerate God would destroy the human mind by making it so rigid and unadaptable as to depend on one book, the Bible, for all the answers. For the use of words, and thus of a book, is to point beyond themselves to a world of life and experience that is not mere words or even ideas. Just as money is not real, consumable wealth, books are not life. To idolize scriptures is like eating paper currency." -- Alan Watts, "The Book", 1966

***********

Genuine spiritual growth doesn't come from a book - at best the book is merely a pointer. Fundamentalists worship words - the most extreme among them use those words to justify flying airliners into buildings. It's all about fear of the unknown, and trying to control future outcomes through following rituals.

PS: I remember "Carolina Guitarman" - he was someone else. ;)

23 posted on 03/19/2008 3:18:58 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Jeeves; wideawake; MeanWestTexan
In other words your problem is not with "fundamentalism" but with religion itself. I admire your consistency, but you might be more careful to exhibit it in future posts.

How fortunate we are that science has discovered the true moral code! With some minor wrangling between Marxists and Randians, of course.

A final word of advice. Your "compassion for all people who struggle with these issues" is camouflaged behind very patronizing words. You might want to adjust your own cookie cutter "simpletons vs. enlightened people such as myself" attitude. You sound a bit religious yourself.

24 posted on 03/19/2008 3:24:35 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Velo' `amad 'echad lifneyhem! / Velo' `amad 'echad bifneyhem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson