[Campion]

The fact that Luther could be wrong about something doesn't condemn Lutherans does it? From my perspective it only shows he was a fallible human like the rest of us.

Lutherans and Calvinists still believe that, though. It wasn't just a "Luther thing".

There are still people on the hard edge of the Reformation who will bitterly defend imputed righteousness over against the "Romish heresy of infused righteousness". If you need reinforcements from Opus Dei or the Swiss Guard to defend against the onslaught, just give me a call. ;-)

[Petronski]

Oh God, now we’re bring French lawyer Jean Cauvin into this?

Euh.

[wmfights]

There are still people on the hard edge of the Reformation who will bitterly defend imputed righteousness over against the "Romish heresy of infused righteousness".

I really don't follow the distinction. I'll have to read up on it.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

There are still people on the hard edge of the Reformation who will bitterly defend imputed righteousness over against the "Romish heresy of infused righteousness".

LOL. "Hard edge"?!?

Almost to a one, Bible-believing Christians will affirm our salvation by the imputed righteousness of Christ, and not according to the lie of Rome that says Christ's righteousness is infused into us, thereby permitting a man's good works to earn him his salvation.

The devil is indeed in the details.