To: big'ol_freeper; 2ndDivisionVet; ConservativeMind; Gamecock; Alex Murphy; wmfights; HarleyD; ...
This is simply a ludicrous argument, as if Martin Luther would not thoroughly and entirely reject any Christianity that Adolf Hitler espoused.
Because Luther underscored his disappointment that Judaism is an enemy of the gospel does not in the least mean that Luther would have supported the murders of this socialist man, Hitler.
Godwin’s law.
The author of this article automatically loses.
136 posted on
03/15/2008 1:27:26 PM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
To: xzins
Finally!! Thanks chaplain.
141 posted on
03/15/2008 1:35:21 PM PDT by
big'ol_freeper
("...millions hate what they mistakenly think that the Catholic Church is." ~ Archbishop Fulton Sheen)
To: xzins
Because Luther underscored his disappointment that Judaism is an enemy of the gospel does not in the least mean that Luther would have supported the murders of this socialist man, Hitler. Hi, xzins! A bump to your excellent observation and a belated ping to my posts. 8~)
210 posted on
03/15/2008 2:59:19 PM PDT by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: xzins
Because Luther underscored his disappointment that Judaism is an enemy of the gospel does not in the least mean that Luther would have supported the murders of this socialist man, Hitler.I suggest you read this.
267 posted on
03/15/2008 3:37:45 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Nice job, Hillary. Now go home and get your shine box.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson