Never’s a long time.
It’s not a raging priority. If convenient sometime, I might.
But he’s not the only valid source regarding such things—IF he is that, at all.
Given your pontifications, I’d gather he’s either wholesale sold out to the RC edifice or been cleansed and vetted.
You won’t - because Eusibius’ History will reveal to you and your protestant friends the error of your ways.
What “valid source” do you have that is 16 centuries old?
There have been a few translations get them all to see for yourself that the differences amount to a hill of beans. It is on Amazon, you can have it in two days, and read it in another two.
You won’t, you can’t - since it will put the same thoughts into your head as it has many converts to Catholicism.
Talk is relatively cheap - investing the time to read the book - counts. It would take cajones on your part.
Lurking’
“It’s not a raging priority. If convenient sometime, I might.”
another point - you feel free to bash Catholics ad nauseum regarding apostolic succession - yet you find little motivating you to read about the errors of your beliefs from someone who was there 1600 years ago.
If your read the authors from just the first 200 years from Christ’s death and Resurrection you would be dumbfounded.
I’ll bet you five pounds of hot peppers or three jars of Louisiana hot sauce - that you have never read even one of the 1-3 century authors.
Again you can’t read any of them as it will change your world view.
Lurking’