Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: narses

You’ll be pleased to know that I have 2 of Hahn’s books on my shelf AND have read them.

They were unconvincing, and while they were appropriate critiques in some areas, they totally failed to convince of RC Mariology. Mariology is a totally unprovable albatross about the necks of Catholic Christians, and they should be told the truth that there is absolutely no biblical basis for the Immaculate Conception or Assumption.

Additionally, the IC is illogical and the Assumption is purely emotional.

I don’t wish to offend you, nor even argue with you, a fellow Christian, so I’ll just drop this here. You can have the last word.

My sense is that even Scott Hahn (and especially Jerry Kirk’s daughter) know these things deep in the honest side of their hearts.


243 posted on 03/08/2008 8:03:32 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

Winderful. Let me suggest, gently, that the Catechism with it’s careful Biblical scholarship is the place to truly read what is taught. Assuming arguendo that the IC and Marionology are the big issue for you, what are your issues with the Sacramental divide?


244 posted on 03/08/2008 8:06:15 AM PST by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson