[al_c]

Conversely its ok when you refer to prostestants as heretics and separated brethren. You prove my point about Catholics on this site being thin skinned.

Show me where I have ever referred to a non-Catholic as a heretic or separated.

You're dodging the topic here, Steven. Are there any articles (not posts) posted on FR containing Catholics calling non-Catholics "whore of Babylon" or "anti-Christ?"

[Quix]

I don’t think we have such easy targets on that score.

But there have been some that came awfully close. I don’t recall the particulars.

And, I’m not, per se, defending the Protty targets . . . but I think some such as Binny Hinn et al were railed at as fiercely as those labels—just not quite THOSE labels.

Regardless, folks ought to be free to state their convictions about such matters within forum rules.

Convictions are beliefs, words, information. They are not literally rusty daggers to the heart.

If we can’t handle mere words from one another with more patience and grace, what will we do when the fierce level of the END TIMES hits???

[Invincibly Ignorant]

there’s no dodge. I’ve equated Catholics calling non-catholics heretics and separated bretheren with non catholics saying “whore of bablylon. If you don’t see the similarities I can’t help ya.

[Invincibly Ignorant]

oops forgot to ping you to #733.

[OLD REGGIE]

Show me where I have ever referred to a non-Catholic as a heretic or separated.

Let's not make it personal. I don't recall you being accused of making those claims. Many-many of your "fellows" have done so however.

You're dodging the topic here, Steven. Are there any articles (not posts) posted on FR containing Catholics calling non-Catholics "whore of Babylon" or "anti-Christ?"

I agree those two charges seem to be exclusive to the RCC and/or the Pope. I wonder why you are now limiting your complaint to a very few selected "charges" while ignoring the myriad of charges against Protestantism.

It goes both ways my friend.