[pby]

LOL!

Now really, you’re on a conservative site like the FR, & you take an article in the NYT as undisputed truth? Back in 1912, the NYT could recognize fraud and, at that point, they weren't, yet, participating in fraud.

It is a good article...did you read it?

[Reno232]

Yes, I did. The article I posted is a good article. Did you read it? If so, what’s your refutation, other than perhaps to say it’s spin. BTW, much of what was believed in 1912 about various things, including ancient writings, have been shown wrong. This article addresses a few of these points.

Now I am looking for reasoned discussion here. If your game, I am as well. If your looking for a trip to the sandbox, I’ll pass. That’s why I will not respond to MHG’s post, been there & done that. I’ve been called an agent of Satan by those who have differing views & no answers to the views I express except to call names & call it spin. Maturity will not allow the participation in such foolish games.

So, the ball’s in your court. Reasoned, adult discussion, or no discussion other than w/ those w/ whom you agree. Your call. My time is somewhat limited today, but I will respond as I can