[nicmarlo]

We use the King James version, unaltered.

Well, that's nice to know, and it contradicts what I was told up thread. Now....next question: which "parts" of the Old and New Testaments, in the KJV, are, according to LDS: "omitted, distorted, or deleted...passage[s]" and should be questioned as to their meaning or intent, as written in the KJV?

[sevenbak]

I wouldn’t know. I read the KJV as is. If you follow the footnotes, occasionally you will see a JST (Joseph Smith Translation), but you have to click on the link to see what the difference is. There aren't very many, so we usually don't bother with them.

Frankly, I am truly grateful that the Lord has seen fit to give us the Bible, after 2000 years, that confirms his truth and great love for us. Would that all men would use it and believe it!