Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: nicmarlo

Nic you have fixed believe and there is no way to converse with one in this mode.

I can share with another but if they don’t do their own homewoke and continue to spew someone elses errors as their own what more as there to say.

Also you keep trying to put words in my mouth about what you think I beleive about the scriptures.

My first teething was on the Bible and it is because of the short comings that I continues my quest because I knew from the Bible there was more for the Bible scriptures testify of it which could not be denied.

It is not the scripture that fall short but what has been omitten, distorted, or deleted if a passage says according too, and one looks for it and it it not available, I want to know for myself not someone explination!

This was before I every heard of the LDS


132 posted on 02/17/2008 3:08:38 PM PST by restornu (Elevate Your Thoughts! Will I accept of an offering, saith the Lord, that is not made in my name?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: restornu

My fixed belief is on the Scriptures, and that they are inherently CORRECT. Anything that goes against Scriptures is wrong. I shall not be moved, nor persuaded, nor beguiled into thinking any other way.

It is you who have a fixed belief that the Scriptures are wrong, you even said so. When I quoted from Scripture, you said I shouldn’t rely upon them because they are in error.

They are not in error. As the Apostle Paul said, “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God” 2 Timothy 3:16. Now, they are either ALL correct or Paul is ALL wet. It’s one or the other.

I happen to think that it’s some others folks who are “all wet” when they start picking and choosing which of Scripture is God’s Word and which isn’t; which Scripture can be kept and which thrown out.

You’re saying you claim that you don’t have to address the Scriptures that I quote because “parts of Scripture is omitten, distorted, or deleted.” Well, golly, just “what parts” are those, I’ve been asking. But you don’t want to say. A convenient “defense” to reject whatever Holy Scriptures from the Old or New Testaments that I post in response to your claims about what your alleged prophet Joseph Smith said. I find the Holy Scriptures more credible (as earlier posted about knowing who is and who is not a true prophet) than what a human being, born 2,000 years after Christ says.


133 posted on 02/17/2008 3:40:29 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson