When and where did any of us claim that the Church hierarchy is uncorrupted. Bernard Law comes to mind.
I was talking about the group, as I think Kosta was, not the individual. As I understand it, your group as a whole teaches infallibly according to itself (Latin, not Orthodox). Kosta said, in essence, IMO, that at the very beginning "the group" was not really all that together on correct doctrine, beliefs, etc. I was asking when and how did that change.
***I was talking about the group, as I think Kosta was, not the individual. As I understand it, your group as a whole teaches infallibly according to itself (Latin, not Orthodox). Kosta said, in essence, IMO, that at the very beginning “the group” was not really all that together on correct doctrine, beliefs, etc. I was asking when and how did that change.***
The Church agreed on a consensus; sometimes it took a while to achieve, yet the Church teaches infallibly utilizing fallible men. Of course there were differences at the beginning; as our understanding of Christianity developed, the great differences were labelled as heresy and the minor differences were settled over time.