Yes, the scripture that was 'canonized' (there really never was a Church-wide canonization, if you think about it) in praxis was based on what was believed then, and what is practiced and believed today.
I was simply stating that the Church cannot elevate itself above its own beliefs. So, charges that the Church holds itself "higher" than the scriptures is an oxyomoron.
“I was simply stating that the Church cannot elevate itself above its own beliefs. So, charges that the Church holds itself “higher” than the scriptures is an oxyomoron.”
I understood. I simply wanted to flesh out your comment in light of what seems to me to be a disturbing level of bibliolatry on the one hand and a certain deficit in knowledge of the history of scripture on the other which shows up on occasion around here among some.