The Orthodox would have no reason to feel a "loss" in this case because the Assyrian Church is not Orthodox! It would really help to at least do a cursory research before shooting from the hip, FK and HD.
But, as I replied to HD earlier, I would rather see the Assyrians go to the Church of the West then to remain in the Church that is Christologically flawed (Nestorian). I am actually, quite happy for those who returned to the Church! :)
It's interesting to compare, since if someone from my Bible-believing SBC church moved to another Bible-believing church, such as a Reformed Presbyterian church, there would be no "loss".
They are not leaving the Church (they are not in it to begin with!); they are changing assemblies. In our case, if someone leaves the Church, it's a big deal; more like a funeral.
Now I am sure if you heard that HD decided to become Orthodox and that he finally realized how flawed Reformed theology is, I am sure you'd feel a little "pang" if not a major chest pain. :)
“...as I replied to HD earlier, I would rather see the Assyrians go to the Church of the West then to remain in the Church that is Christologically flawed (Nestorian). I am actually, quite happy for those who returned to the Church! :)
The issue on the other thread had to do with ecclesiology, not theology, namely Rome accepting a bishop under discipline from his own Synod. That sort of interference in the workings of a synod of bishops within the Apostolic Succession is among the concerns which Orthodox people have about reunion with Rome.
Theologically speaking, to the extent that the Assyrians are still and in fact Nestorians, it goes without saying that those faithful are better off with Rome and a more correct Christology than remaining Nestorian heretics. Fleeing heresy, however, was not what motivated these people.
Well, I can't deny that! :)
I'm not holding my breath, though. :)