Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Forest Keeper

Umm, FK, we need to talk.

The verses from Isaiah don’t mean what you present them to mean.

The verses from Romans do not specify that only the elect are going to Heaven. And neither do the verses from Mark and John.

FK, you have given it a yeoman’s effort. I’ll give you points on it if you wish. You have been very persistent in trying to make sense out of nonsense. You have given all that you can in stating what the Reformed position is versus the reality of Scripture. But that dog don’t hunt.

If you’d like, I could show you where the Reformed position has gone wrong (starting with Genesis). Give up, give in and come back to God, my friend. Your compatriots are leading you down the garden path.


484 posted on 01/29/2008 8:39:43 PM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies ]


To: MarkBsnr; conservonator; Lord_Calvinus; Dr. Eckleburg
The verses from Isaiah don’t mean what you present them to mean.

Perhaps I should not have used them as stand alones, I will grant you that. However the point is that God CHOOSES specific people for specific purposes all throughout the Bible. Why would such a pattern apply EXCEPT for the most important thing of all? That makes no sense. God chooses who will perform the tasks He wants done. One of those tasks is believing itself.

The verses from Romans do not specify that only the elect are going to Heaven. And neither do the verses from Mark and John.

That's a curious read. Who else do you suppose is going to Heaven besides the elect? I could see a far stretched reading of Romans and Mark being a subset, but not of John:

John 1:12-13 : 12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: 13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. KJV

This specifically says "as many", not "more" or "less" or "some of" or some other unequal.

You have given all that you can in stating what the Reformed position is versus the reality of Scripture. But that dog don’t hunt.

Thank you for the compliment, but it's been no struggle at all. The dog is always hunting for an even deeper understanding based on a solidly scriptural framework. :)

If you’d like, I could show you where the Reformed position has gone wrong (starting with Genesis).

Sure, I would be happy to discuss it.

Give up, give in and come back to God, my friend. Your compatriots are leading you down the garden path.

All believers must give up, give in, and come to God. But for me, I'm afraid there is no "back". :) The God I know now is the same and only one I have ever known. I just know a lot more about Him now than I did before, and I am much closer to Him now. And THAT is in large part due to my compatriots, whom I thank God for every day. They have given me great insights into how the totality of scripture works together to reveal one coherent message, just as you spoke of earlier. They have truly been God's blessing to me.

635 posted on 01/30/2008 11:23:36 PM PST by Forest Keeper (It is a joy to me to know that God had my number, before He created numbers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson