I didn't force you to say "Then his freedom is faux freedom. It's a charade. He is led to believe that he has freedom but God didn't tell him the whole truth—that his choices have been "preordained." He is under the impression that he is free to choose, and yet he is not. He is deceived."
You did that on your own at post 4603.
And the statement was a perfect "fall guy" for my "sermon" at 4633 as you call it, i.e. that God does not lie, Praise God!!!
Leave a door open and chances are pretty good someone will walk through it.
"Then" was a giweaway of what? I was responding to your ridiculous statement that Peter had the freedom but didn't because it was "perfectly possible" for predestination and free will to co-exist.
If this were true, then Peter's freedom is faux freedom and he would be deceived into believing otherwise.
I followed that with "And Christian God doesn't lie" which you conveniently left out in order for you to declare "God doesn't lie" ad make it look like I suggested otherwise. That's pathetic, A-G.
Leave a door open and chances are pretty good someone will walk through it
The door was not open. You opened it. It's like a thief who says "the alarm wasn't set, so I walked in."
But, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Those who live by the sword, die by the sword. What you sow if what you reap.