Would you rephrase, or explain what are your two posts in reference to, or permit me to ignore them?
You’re quite welcome to ignore them.
I seem to be fresh out of decoder rings.
I’d give you a rain check for one but there’s no guarantee at all that I’ll ever get any more.
. . . having sympathy on the perceptually challenged . . .
Poster said in 4251:
I am sure Kosta is referring to the modern goofy connotation of “daddy” nonstop promoted by the secular media, and not the sense of familial intimacy with God that Christ gave us in His Church.
. . .
I realize that folks who refuse to obey God about calling leaders Father . . . might have some definite confusions about fitting meanings and uses of “Daddy.”
However, I merely wanted to forcefully assert that . . . for those of us with UNRUBBERIZED BIBLES and UNRUBBERIZED DICTIONARIES . . .
and especially for those of us with ATTACHMENT DISORDERED backgrounds . . .
DADDY . . . particularly in it’s loftier meanings . . .
is
NOT
REMOTELY
goofy.