Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: conservonator

***Soooo, what Romanist Council did Jesus and the Apostles fall back on to know what was Scripture?

is “Romanist” the preferred term now? What ever happened to “Papist”?***

You forget, my friend, that many of these folks believe that the KJV was complete, read by Jesus and the Apostles (in English), and hundreds of millions of them were kept in locked warehouses by the Church until liberated by the theological giants Luther and Calvin.

Further, they believe that the mutilated and vandalized versions of the Bible that they quote from were written as is, commanded by Jesus to have the content that they have, and the Catholic Church is the entity that added the Deuterocanonicals in reponse to the holy interventions of the Reformers. And the Restorationists. And every other brand spanking new theological giant who can put a different twist on a different set of out of context Biblical verse and hang out a shingle to con the rubes.


266 posted on 01/29/2008 10:41:29 AM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]


To: MarkBsnr
As silly, and downright wrong the are, I do have to admire their devotion to what they believe is the narrow path. Not that that means they don’t need to be brought to the fullness of faith, but I do admire their devotion to Scripture...to bad that it’s often reduced to bits and snippets rather than a coherent view of the entire message.
336 posted on 01/29/2008 1:41:42 PM PST by conservonator (spill czeck is knot my friend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson