Posted on 01/27/2008 7:56:14 PM PST by Manfred the Wonder Dawg
Given your entirely seriousness . . .
perhaps it’s time to allow others to know that quite commonly and evidently in this case, the
PD stands for
either or both:
1. Personality Disorders in general
and/or
2. Psychopatic Disorder
Please keep in mind, the poster asserts how serious the poster is about such matters.
Perhaps the only more serious label available that one might hope to apply to an enemy would be that of ‘axe murderer.’
Nevertheless, I appreciate the complement. It’s a LOT better than being luke warm. LOL. Sigh!
This is like a smokescreen behind which the first person’s point is lost.
= = =
I think the Prottys hereon learned this tactic from the RC’s hereon.
And that's actually a key point and aspect of the diagnosis, what is colloquially called the "psychic vampire" phenomenon.
A metaphor is that the sufferer feels, shall we say, "lacking" or "invalid".
(This is not a spiritual phenomenon. One can be psychologically adequate and still realize how profound the need for Christ is.)
The things lacked are things like affirmation of existence, sense of power, sense of importance, worth, etc.
At least in an aspect I've seen here, the sufferer himself cannot "contain" himself, but also doesn't get the affirmation he needs if he does contain himself. The principle is: If you make a big enough mess, Mommy and Daddy will certainly have to clean up AND pay attention to you.
The more the sufferer can sucker anyone into an exchange which can then be drawn out by all manner of devices, the happier and more secure the sufferer of S-E feels. And the more frustrated or angry the sufferer's target gets, the more powerful the sufferer feels. " I can MAKE Mommy and Daddy pay attention to me!"
This is just a metaphor, but it works pretty well, both in terms of diagnosis and of directing response.
I'm assuming you have a through knowledge of scripture, right? It is for you and all Protestants the sole rule of faith so it would be a given that you would have already read the Scripture I would post, correct. Since you have already created a line of belief from you reading of Scripture and of the Institutes, how would me posting averse, chapter or even a whole book change you views? It would not, has not and will not until you commit to read the Holy Writ with new eyes. Not in the piecemeal pretexting fashion we are so used to here on FR but in a coherent, cogent way that brings to life the greatest love story ever written: Gods love for man.
Well, doesn't it sure sound exactly like the real idolatry that is described for us in the Bible? :
The Duck billed Platypus has a bill, webbed feet and lays eggs, but it is not a duck. If these people actually believed that the stone answered their prayers, that would be idolatry, but with out talking to them, delving deep into their understanding of intercessory prayer and the role of the saints in heaven, then it's merely a case of projection.
You are truly gracious not to judge, but your fear of iconography is a heresy we dealt with long ago and is your own problem, not the problem of properly catechized believers. I will note, however, that proper catechesis is sorely lacking in many parts of the world, the US is no exception.
The Church is two fold. There is the body of believers holding the faith as handed to us from the institutional Church founded by Christ, which is hierarchal in design and perfect in it's teaching role as it regards the faith "who hears you, hears Me". We are free to question may things, just not reveled truth, that would be a folly of pride.
Fascinating theory.
Seriously problematic application; but, nevertheless, an interesting theory.
BTW, I am truly honored to have provided so many hours of contemplation.
We were told faith is "not enough" because even the fallen angels have faith that Christ is Lord.
We responded that all the world is without excuse in recognizing Christ is Lord, but that ONLY those who have been given saving faith in Jesus Christ recognize Christ as their SAVIOUR.
Again we'll ask, what fallen angel, what demon, what Satan has faith that Christ is their Saviour?
None.
Faith is not simply a familiarity with Christ's name. Faith is knowing that Christ died to pay for one's sins in full.
No fallen angel has faith that Jesus Christ paid for their sins.
This is not a difficult concept to understand, MD, and we'll all pray for your guidance and enlightenment.
The rest of your post concerning your experience with alcoholism and personality disorders is interesting but meaningless to this conversation.
See? "The bad children MADE me do it" = "I'm not responsible for what I do."
It's the same kind of thing as thing as "I have to use this offensive language because I feel so strongly I can't hold it back."
My favorite line from Star Wars III (I think it is, I get mixed up on them Star Wars movies) - Han Solo; It's not my fault!
Ping to 427. I need a list. 8~)
BBWWAAAHHHH!!!
"Axe Murderer."
Comes right after "Alchemy" and before "Idolatry."
“I have to use this offensive language because I feel so strongly I can’t hold it back.”
= = =
i believe that honesty is much more becoming . . . and attractive . . .
I’ve been pretty clear about my language choices. The above was not one of them.
But far be it from me to hinder a Jr Shrink theory building.
LOL.
hadn’t thought of that.
It really is comforting to keep some seemingly, theoretically theologically challenged RC reps off the streets so much. LOL.
[joke group]
But perhaps I should keep my Swiss Army knife handy in case they come for me with the nets and long sleeved white coats.
Jesus created the Catholic Church. I’m not sure of what you mean by the RCC.
The eunuch was unable to discern Scripture until taught by the Church. It is extremely apparent that that condition still applies. All those outside the Church are to be considered as eunuchs, well at least they give the theological appearance of eunuchs.
I notice that you give extreme credence to Malachi Martin. Do a little research on him before you parade him as a Catholic standard, if you would?
What precedes this line “..according to his works.” Now realize that works are not a fruit, nore are they a self generated act, they are the glorification of the Lord in this world, His work, all preformed at the cleaving g our will to his and in doing so, decreasing so that He may increase with in us. Faith with out works is dead, just as works with out faith are worthless.
Some things get my attention: first the APPARENT (IOW maybe not real) inability to distinguish between "process" and "content", the repetition of the diversionary tactic, the effort to "hook" me on a "content level", and, of course, the contempt - the "dynamic" of which should need no explanation at this point.
I would say one of the signs of a pathological process is the relative hamfistedness of the reactions. These are smart people. But you couldn't tell that from their rebuffs, which remind me of prep school 10th graders in 1962-63.
Grown-ups don't do that kind of stuff, but I am told that a priest at the end of a long career of parish ministry was asked what he had learned for hearing so many confessions, and he said, "few people are happy and even fewer ever grow up."
Having been for the most part a dis-interested observer on this thread with the exception of a brief conversation with the poster, I can’t help but notice that you tend to be quite insulting at times, and then of course, indignant when someone confronts you. By theirs fruits, ye shall know them. Always a good verse to keep in mind. And if you are wondering what truly brought this comment, read below:
It really is comforting to keep some seemingly, theoretically theologically challenged RC reps off the streets so much. LOL.
Must be nice just to pass off this stuff as jokes.
***Paul didn’t have a problem telling Peter, James, and John they were wrong and stood condemned.***
So Paul is entirely right, and Peter, James, John, and Jesus are entirely wrong?
You guys are entirely funny. The misunderstanding of Paul trumps the words of Jesus.
Royal Crown Cola. I thought everybody knew that. Just like "episcopal" is an anagram for PepsiCola.
***THE CHURCH UNIVERSAL
IS FARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
from equal to the RC edifice***
The Church Universal is the Catholic Church. Quitters and splitters don’t get to make the rule.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.