Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: STARWISE

That link would, of course. We will have to see if Joey gets his eyesight back.


35 posted on 01/08/2008 7:49:00 AM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurtureā„¢)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: steve86
Bishop's Verdict on Garabandal

non constat de supernaturalitate (it is not established supernatural)

This is not the slam dunk "constat de non supernaturalitate", but the Holy See determined that it would not usurp the Bishop's right to discern the matter. The bishop has said it will not be revisited. A future bishop could techinically re-open the matter, but that's highly unlikely. Given the time-sensitivity of the messages, it won't serve God's will to approve Garabandal when it's message is no longer timely. So at least in my opinion, Garabandal is not legitimate. Padre Pio is not infallible, so even if he opined that they are authentic, it means nothing.

FWIW, since the visionaries predicted John Paul II to be the last pope, there doesn't seem to be any credibility here.

39 posted on 01/08/2008 9:48:12 AM PST by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson