LOL!!! I can't think of ONE authentic Catholic church father listed in the scriptures. I suppose they could try to claim Peter, but that's 2 books out of 66. :O)
“LOL!!! I can’t think of ONE authentic Catholic church father listed in the scriptures. I suppose they could try to claim Peter, but that’s 2 books out of 66. :O)”
Being the Pharisee that I am, and in all honesty the first among sinners, I am sooooooooooooooooooooo glad the uneducated character who wrote this foolish article is definitely NOT Orthodox! One would think that the Latins would be a little more careful with what goes out with the approval of that particular church. It would appear otherwise. Did you notice his comment about an “imprimatur”? I looked for one on the site and couldn’t find it, which I suppose is cause for some encouragement. What is unfortunate is that this site is apparently very widely read among lay Latins and if this and other articles online are any indication, it fosters a distorted picture not only of Church history, but also of Latin theology too.
A Blessed Feast of the Nativity to you and yours, HD!
Of course the only difference between Protestant and Mormon is timing - both religions think thsey can have a bible with and without what ever they see fit at that point in time.
One came during the reformation to worship Luther and one came later to worship Joeseph Smith, but they are both heretics at heart.
I agree with you.